The Kappes ICSID case: mining and prior consultation
- The legal framework for foreign investment
- Arbitration and investor protection
- Audited
Daniel W. Kappes and Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (KCA) sued under CAFTA-DR (ICSID ARB/18/43) over Exmingua's gold mine (the Progreso VII Derivada project), whose license was suspended for want of prior consultation under ILO Convention 169. The award of 23 December 2025 found certain breaches of the treaty but granted no damages: US$0. The no-damages outcome was verified against IAReporter in the audit of 2026-08-19. For a mining investor, the case shows that a suspension over prior consultation can be recognized as a treaty breach without translating into compensation.
The research is written in English; quoted figures, source names and the titles of legal instruments stay in the language their source published them in.
Figures
- Kappes v. Guatemala award
- 23 December 2025 — violations acknowledged, no damages
- Damages awarded
- US$0
Sources
Organizations named in the answer
Related records
This layer is research: read from public sources by the archive's own team, every claim cited with the date it was consulted, and audited where it is marked so. It has not entered the verified store — no figure here was fetched back from its source or stamped with a retrieval time — so it wears no red provenance numeral and never mixes with the verified figures.