Skip to content
Saturday, September 12, 2026 · Guatemala CityQ7.6282 per US$+0.00%
ADVANCE GUATEMALA
Back to the researchIn research — sources cited, not yet in the verified archive

In depth

The ruling in IC Power v. Guatemala (Energuate)

Dossier
The legal framework for foreign investment02-marco-legal.md
Domain
Arbitration and investor protectionlegal-arbitraje
Room
Law/ley
Audited
not audited

IC Power Asia Development sued under UNCITRAL rules (ad hoc/PCA) invoking the Israel-Guatemala BIT (identification of the treaty still to be confirmed) over Energuate's electricity distribution (DEORSA-DEOCSA). The final award of 7 October 2020 dismissed the claims by majority, with G. S. Tawil dissenting. The background: Energuate paid around US$75 million to the tax authority (SAT) under protest after criminal measures for tax fraud. Enforcement and costs were litigated in the Southern District of New York in 2022.

The research is written in English; quoted figures, source names and the titles of legal instruments stay in the language their source published them in.

Figures

IC Power v. Guatemala final awardKluwer Arbitration Blog
7 October 2020 — claims dismissed by majority2020
Energuate payment to SAT under protestKluwer Arbitration Blog
~US$75 millioncontext prior to the award

Caveat

the treaty invoked is still to be confirmed; the US$75 million is an approximate figure from a specialist blog

Sources

Organizations named in the answer

  • IC Power Asia DevelopmentAn ISDS case (Energuate/DEORSA-DEOCSA) dismissed by a majority in 2020; no award against Guatemala.Company case

Directory of organizations

Related records

This layer is research: read from public sources by the archive's own team, every claim cited with the date it was consulted, and audited where it is marked so. It has not entered the verified store — no figure here was fetched back from its source or stamped with a retrieval time — so it wears no red provenance numeral and never mixes with the verified figures.