Skip to content
Saturday, September 12, 2026 · Guatemala CityQ7.6282 per US$+0.00%
ADVANCE GUATEMALA
Back to the researchIn research — sources cited, not yet in the verified archive

In depth

Environmental restrictions at Atitlán: Decree 64-97 and CONAP

Dossier
Tourism, hospitality and residency24-turismo-residencia.md
Domain
Environmental licensing and protected areasambiental
Room
Law/ley
Audited
Audited

Decree 64-97 (6-Aug-1997) declares the Lake Atitlán basin a Multiple Use Reserve Protected Area: ≈625 km² (the lake 130 km²), administered by the national protected areas council (CONAP) under its master plan. Management zones (article 4): multiple use 139.8 km² (25%, settlements and agriculture), recovery 72.1 km², forest management 30.3 km², archaeological-cultural 76.1 km², extensive use (the lake), protective forest 147 km² and primitive 29.3 km² (the volcanic cones). Article 9 orders the prevention of 'industries or potentially polluting activities, as well as works that may cause a significant alteration of ecological conditions'. Under article 20 of the Protected Areas Act (Decree 4-89), any firm with commercial or tourism activities inside a protected area must sign a contract 'by mutual agreement with CONAP', on conditions 'determined by an environmental impact study' compatible with the master plan. No municipal ordinance from 2024-26 on shoreline construction was found, nor any branded hotel pipeline on the lake.

The research is written in English; quoted figures, source names and the titles of legal instruments stay in the language their source published them in.

Figures

RUMCLA areaDecreto 64-97
≈625 km² (lake 130 km²)in force
Multiple use zoneDecreto 64-97 art. 4
139.8 km² (25%)in force
Requirement to operateDecreto 4-89 art. 20
contract with CONAP + EIAin force

Caveat

the RUMCLA master plan in force was not reviewed

Sources

Related records

This layer is research: read from public sources by the archive's own team, every claim cited with the date it was consulted, and audited where it is marked so. It has not entered the verified store — no figure here was fetched back from its source or stamped with a retrieval time — so it wears no red provenance numeral and never mixes with the verified figures.