Skip to content
Saturday, September 12, 2026 · Guatemala CityQ7.6282 per US$+0.00%
ADVANCE GUATEMALA
Back to the researchIn research — sources cited, not yet in the verified archive

In depth

No open list of aquaculture licences: what DIPESCA publishes and what it does not

Dossier
25 proveedores acuicultura25-proveedores-acuicultura.md
Domain
sectores/acuiculturasectores/acuicultura
Room
Economy/economia
Audited
not audited

The DIPESCA pages reviewed on 2 September 2026 (the Directorate's site on maga.gob.gt and its section within VISAR) publish national, regional and international legislation and the official application form for a commercial-fishing concession; they do not publish a roll of aquaculture licences or a list of authorised shrimp farms or exporters. The law requires every concession to be recorded in a technical file (art. 53), so the register exists as an administrative act but not as open data. The national open-data catalogue (catalogo.senacyt.gob.gt) refused the system's automated queries that same day (HTTP 403), so it could not be confirmed there either. Until the list is public, the honest route to identify suppliers is the one this dossier follows: AGEXPORT's Exporters Directory (membership, not licence), the sanitary and export certifications that VISAR and DIPESCA do publish, and a public-information request to DIPESCA for the roll of current licences.

The research is written in English; quoted figures, source names and the titles of legal instruments stay in the language their source published them in.

Figures

Public register of aquaculture and fishing licencesMAGA–DIPESCA, sitio de la Dirección (legislación; sin padrón publicado)
not published on the DIPESCA or VISAR pages (information request pending)2 Sep 2026

Caveat

Declared gap: the absence of an open list is proven on the captured pages, not on the whole MAGA site. Public-information request pending dispatch by the operator.

Sources

Related records

This layer is research: read from public sources by the archive's own team, every claim cited with the date it was consulted, and audited where it is marked so. It has not entered the verified store — no figure here was fetched back from its source or stamped with a retrieval time — so it wears no red provenance numeral and never mixes with the verified figures.