No open list of aquaculture licences: what DIPESCA publishes and what it does not
- 25 proveedores acuicultura
- sectores/acuicultura
- not audited
The DIPESCA pages reviewed on 2 September 2026 (the Directorate's site on maga.gob.gt and its section within VISAR) publish national, regional and international legislation and the official application form for a commercial-fishing concession; they do not publish a roll of aquaculture licences or a list of authorised shrimp farms or exporters. The law requires every concession to be recorded in a technical file (art. 53), so the register exists as an administrative act but not as open data. The national open-data catalogue (catalogo.senacyt.gob.gt) refused the system's automated queries that same day (HTTP 403), so it could not be confirmed there either. Until the list is public, the honest route to identify suppliers is the one this dossier follows: AGEXPORT's Exporters Directory (membership, not licence), the sanitary and export certifications that VISAR and DIPESCA do publish, and a public-information request to DIPESCA for the roll of current licences.
The research is written in English; quoted figures, source names and the titles of legal instruments stay in the language their source published them in.
Figures
- Public register of aquaculture and fishing licences
- not published on the DIPESCA or VISAR pages (information request pending)
Caveat
Sources
Related records
- The legal frame for fishing and aquaculture: MAGA, DIPESCA and the concession by licence
- The Aquaculture and Fisheries companies in AGEXPORT's Exporters Directory
- The Pacific shrimp fleet's TED certification (NOAA inspection, August 2026)
- Fish and crustacean trade is already in the verified archive (HS chapters 03 and 16)
- The shrimp producers in the Exporters Directory: products, certifications and declared markets
- The shrimp producers in the Exporters Directory: products, certifications and declared markets (2)
This layer is research: read from public sources by the archive's own team, every claim cited with the date it was consulted, and audited where it is marked so. It has not entered the verified store — no figure here was fetched back from its source or stamped with a retrieval time — so it wears no red provenance numeral and never mixes with the verified figures.