Skip to content
Saturday, September 12, 2026 · Guatemala CityQ7.6282 per US$+0.00%
ADVANCE GUATEMALA
Back to the researchIn research — sources cited, not yet in the verified archive

In depth

Rates of other private providers and community water systems

Dossier
Water for industry14-agua-industrial.md
Domain
Industrial water, wells and dischargesagua
Room
Energy/energia
Audited
Audited

Grupo Rosul (private) charges Q5.83/m³ (18 m³ for Q105, Sep 2025), a residential reference. Community systems charge around Q4.00/m³: Pérez Guisasola (zona 10 of Mixco), with consumption above 30 m³ charged at Q10/m³; Condado Bosques de San Nicolás II (zona 4 of Mixco) charges Q30/m³ above the allowance; Chuisuc (Cantel) applies a flat rate of Q15 a month (verified 2026-08-22). According to a MARN figure, 76% of the country's water providers are community committees, 16% municipalities and 8% private. All the figures come from the Con Criterio report of 24 Sep 2025.

The research is written in English; quoted figures, source names and the titles of legal instruments stay in the language their source published them in.

Figures

Grupo RosulCon Criterio
Q5.83/m³ (18 m³ for Q105)Sep 2025
Pérez Guisasola community system, MixcoCon Criterio
~Q4.00/m³; excess >30 m³ at Q10/m³Sep 2025
Condado Bosques de San Nicolás II, Mixco — excess rateCon Criterio
Q30/m³Sep 2025
Chuisuc, Cantel — flat rateCon Criterio
Q15/monthSep 2025
Water providers by typeCon Criterio
76% community committees / 16% municipalities / 8% privateMARN figure cited Sep 2025

Caveat

press figures; residential references

Sources

Organizations named in the answer

  • Grupo RosulDeveloper of the Multinova class-A warehouse complex in San Miguel PetapaDeveloper
  • Con CriterioReport of 26 June 2024 on the RIC: 21 of 340 municipalities surveyed, a Q157.2 M budget, Q49 M executed, 707 employees (696 on contract line 022)Other

Directory of organizations

Related records

This layer is research: read from public sources by the archive's own team, every claim cited with the date it was consulted, and audited where it is marked so. It has not entered the verified store — no figure here was fetched back from its source or stamped with a retrieval time — so it wears no red provenance numeral and never mixes with the verified figures.